Some think that my purpose is to advance my own agenda, others critique that my sole mission is to embarrass those in the public spotlight. Yes, I have heard the rumors (from many) that I was turned away from a city job and am just bitter (funny that every time I hear these rumors they trail back to the same priss sitting behind the dais).
Well, I do not sell advertising space. This is not a business, I don't earn a dime from it. In fact, it costs me money.
We can put the futile attempts at deflection and dismissal to rest, I have no interest in public sector employment. I do quite alright as a budding professional with a good private sector job. I don't see myself taking a pay cut to take an administrative position and be under the microscope of people like, well me.
I was raised better than to "go around embarrassing people." My father always told me that if you go around digging other people's holes, you are bound to fall in yourself. I think we all know that you don't have to go around digging holes, if you give a greedy politician enough rope..... My commentaries are truthful (admittedly, often satirical--but based on research and information). If people are embarrassed, or offended, by any commentary or cartoon I have made, they should take a long hard look at themselves. Fulfill your campaign promises, work to better the city rather than advance your own political agenda and line your friend's pockets. Do the right thing, it will leave nothing to criticize.
My mission is to be, and stay, informed. "Gadflies" (as I guess people like me are called) are assets to any municipality--"...the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do…" I bring information otherwise unknown or not shared to the people, I bring my opinions, what people do with that information is up to them. If I inform and inspire even one person to get involved in their community, I have done what I set out to do. I have, but we'll get to that in more detail shortly....
Thom Ammirato: City Spokesman or CFC Campaign Manager?
The Citizens for Change promised to end back room deals and the rewarding of political insiders. So far their list of appointees is loaded with political insiders and campaign donors.
The Citizens for Change campaign manager, Thom Ammirato, was hired at a cost of $6,500 per month to the city to serve as the city spokesman. Thom Ammirato continues to manage the Citizens for Change website(s) and publish political commentary. I have written before about the potential conflicts. Are the interests of the city, or the interests of a political group, being advanced at this $6,500 monthly cost? Ammirato is not one to shy away from confrontation or take the high road--he regularly spars with residents and voters through email and social media. If it is ever a question what Ammirato's mission is, what better way to interpret it than his own words? See a true copy of an email from Thom Ammirato's to Rose Greenman below.
In the above email, Thom Ammirato replied to Councilwoman Rose Greenman, who sent him a link to my August 13, 2013 story "Out with the patronage, or is it?" He reassures her that there is nothing illegal about patronage. Is that a tacit acknowledgement that they are doling out patronage jobs?
Ammirato goes on to tell Greenman not to mind the gadflies, they are a bunch that "have no idea how government works...they couldn't run a lemonade stand." He calls us gadflies, a bunch of "self appointed do gooders." Funny, because by that logic, this is what I saw on the evening of May 14, 2013.
But it is ok.... They found a good coach....
And before long, we had a new group running City Hall....
|Anthony Rottino and Thom Ammirato|
But I don't get it, is Rottino a friend of change? Or, is he a friend of the Zisa's?
|Anthony Rottino with Lauren Zisa (Editor of the County Seat)|
All the fun of cartoons aside, what is most disturbing of the email is the closing. Ammirato explains that the "goal is to broaden our base... get a real political operation going that further marginalizes these people..." Now that is scary, that is exactly the opposite of what CFC campaigned for. To make matters worse, Rose Greenman replied to the email, she says that she "agree[s] with you [Thom] in this respect..."
Is this the open government the people voted for? Is the likes of Thom Ammirato what the city wanted or needs? It is clear that he sees Hackensack as a piggy bank of political capital and through the Citizens for Change it is his intention to stymie the residents and advance an agenda. But is that agenda what is in the best interests of the residents? Is that agenda true, honest, change? Is the City Council going to continue to allow someone with such a mission to be the official spokesman of the City? Only if their mission is to silence residents and advance a political agenda rather than effectuate real change....
Now, not to spar with Thom Ammirato, but he did make an interesting comment-- "The Gelbers have no following." Just a quick note on that.
The Hackensack Citizens for Change facebook page has 462 followers, in comparison the Hackensack Scoop has 602. The Hackensack Citizens for Change website has 7,102 TOTAL VISITS since it was published, in the past few months the Hackensack Scoop has had 11,034 UNIQUE VISITORS. Please note those are unique visitors, not total visits. I think I am accomplishing what I set out to do, inform and engage. Not bad considering Thom is the professional, as for me and The Scoop--this is just a hobby.
I have never even met Thom Ammirato, but he has continually taken me on and put me down to the council--most recently he attempted to bunch me in with the "Zisa, Salkin, Hurwitz regime" in a post on the CFC facebook page. There is only one way to address this in my eyes, providing Ammirato with a valuable resource. It is never too late to learn to act professionally and with class, especially when he is dealing with the residents and tax payers. See below a package that went out to Thom in today's mail.
Political retribution continues in City Hall
It is no secret that I have doubted, and criticized, the job performance of several key officials in local government. I have criticized (and even sued) Debra Heck for her handling of OPRA requests, I have charged Stephen LoIacono with being asleep at the wheel as the city careened into a morass of litigation, and I have chastised the former administration for their handling of Joe Mellone's blunders and trysts. All three are now without city employment, but let us examine the how and why of their separations with the city.
On September 11, 2013, Rose Greenman learned that Debra Heck and Rick Salkin were engaged. Seemingly irate, Detective Greenman shared her findings with Thom Ammirato and Anthony Rottino.
The three of them make quite a team...
|Boris, tell Natasha to "Sharrup you mouth!" before she writes any other silly emails|
Now personally, I would say gossiping about an employee (Debra Heck) to their coworker (Anthony Rottino) is poor form, but that is just me. Emails uncovered through OPRA requests also show that Kathy Canestrino and Rose Greenman represented to Debra Heck that they were regularly checking her office to monitor her whereabouts and breaks, it appears that they were keeping their own time sheets for the Clerk. Despite referencing these time sheets to Heck, a number of requests from Debra Heck to review them went unanswered. Is this because they do not exist? Is this because Heck was on her regularly scheduled lunches or personal and vacation days when she was not in her office? I suppose this will come to light through the course of discovery.
If Greenman's email to Thom Ammirato and Anthony Rottino (who by the way, she had no right discussing the job performance of any employee with) does not illustrate Greenman's displeasure with Heck and Salkin's relationship, let's look further.
In this email, Greenman replies to a request from Debra Heck to the City Attorney for clarification on how to handle items being pulled from the docket at the last minute. Seeking clarification in performing her duties from the City Attorney "has Salkin's paw prints all over it." Greenman goes on to call Heck "brazen and stupid."
Greenman makes her true paranoia known when she accuses LoIacono and Heck of compiling dossiers on the council. If you did not know, Stephen LoIacono and Debra Heck were actually the reincarnations of J. Edgar Hoover and Helen Gandy, they were spies and they had a file on everyone.
This email shows that Greenman's perception of LoIacono and Heck's political affiliations or personal relationships were her motivation for agreeing to the council requesting their resignations. Whether or not they were the right people for the jobs, Greenman's keystrokes create an exposure to the City. If Greenman has completed her mandatory ethics training--she may want to consider retaking the course.
Information received from city employees indicates that over the last two weeks there has been a rash of suspensions handed out. The city employees have dubbed Art Koster (personnel director) the "henchmen" as he shells out notices to unsuspecting employees. Is this the start of a new wave of suits alleging political retaliation?